Weekly Plan
Starter
10 AED
10 AED per campaign+1 text campaign
+Valid for 7 days
+One-time purchase
+No auto-renew
Pricing Overview
Straightforward plans for consistent LinkedIn execution.
Grovin Tech keeps pricing intentionally simple because the core value of the platform is not hidden in complicated bundles or hard-to-compare add-ons. The product on the homepage is positioned around a very practical operating model: you need a clean place to plan LinkedIn campaigns, schedule content, keep publishing consistent, and make better decisions with less manual coordination. The pricing page below follows that same idea. Instead of making buyers decode long feature tables, we show a clear path for teams that want to start small, scale at a predictable cost, and understand exactly how often they can publish within a plan.
The home page already explains the product around scheduling, approvals, analytics, comment management, and evergreen recycling. Pricing is meant to support that workflow, not distract from it. If you are experimenting with a lighter publishing rhythm, the weekly option gives you a narrow commitment. If you already know LinkedIn is part of your regular growth strategy, the monthly and yearly plans give a more efficient path. That makes the pricing model useful for solo founders, in-house teams, agencies, and operators who want a stable content rhythm rather than a one-off burst of activity.
Why This Structure Works
The pricing model mirrors the home-page promise: one platform, one focused publishing workflow, and enough flexibility for teams at different growth stages. You are paying for consistency, visibility, and reduced coordination overhead rather than for noisy feature inflation.
Best For
Founders, company pages, and marketing teams that want a predictable content cadence instead of irregular posting.
Built Around
Campaign planning, weekly execution, approvals, and visibility into how content performance evolves over time.
Buying Guidance
Choose weekly if you are validating process or running a short campaign window.
Choose monthly if LinkedIn is already part of your regular execution rhythm.
Choose yearly when consistency is established and cost efficiency matters most.
Plans
Choose the plan that matches how often your team actually publishes.
Plans for LinkedIn
Text Post Suite Pricing
Built for founder posts, thought leadership, and company updates.
Start Weekly Campaign
Yearly Plan
240 AED
5 AED per campaign 50% off+48 text campaigns per year
+Auto-renew yearly
+Priority support
+Best cost efficiency
Monthly Plan
Most Popular
28 AED
7 AED per campaign+4 text campaigns every month
+Each campaign runs 7 days
+Auto-renew monthly
+Cancel anytime
How To Think About It
Pricing should make planning easier, not harder.
The weekly plan is the right starting point when you want to validate your workflow, test whether the team is ready to publish on a schedule, or launch around a short campaign window. It is especially useful for founders who are building confidence with a content engine, internal teams that are trying to formalize a process, or agencies that want a contained test before standardizing client delivery. Because it is a one-time purchase with a seven-day validity window, it offers low commitment while still introducing the structure that the home page emphasizes: planned content, deliberate timing, and a visible campaign cycle.
The monthly plan makes the most sense when LinkedIn is already part of your ongoing execution. Four campaigns per month lines up well with a weekly rhythm, which is often the point where teams begin to see whether messaging, format choice, and publishing consistency are working together. At this stage, the value is no longer only about scheduling a single post. It comes from having a repeatable flow across drafts, approvals, publishing, and learning. That is why the home page puts so much weight on both the calendar view and the analytics story. Pricing at the monthly level supports operational discipline, which is usually the missing piece for teams that want to appear more consistent without dramatically increasing coordination effort.
The yearly plan is where efficiency becomes obvious. If your business already knows LinkedIn is a long-term growth channel, the annual option reduces cost per campaign and removes monthly re-evaluation friction. That matters because strong LinkedIn results rarely come from isolated posts. They come from repetition, clearer positioning, and the ability to sustain a publishing rhythm long enough to learn what works. The annual price therefore supports a more strategic approach: build a content engine, let approval workflows stabilize, reuse evergreen ideas intelligently, and keep improving through analytics instead of restarting your process every few weeks.
Plan Fit
Weekly: low-commitment testing with a defined seven-day execution window.
Monthly: steady operating cadence for teams publishing on an ongoing basis.
Yearly: stronger efficiency for organizations already committed to LinkedIn as a channel.
What You Are Really Paying For
The practical value behind every plan is time saved, publishing consistency gained, and decision quality improved. The homepage already frames the product around a content calendar, approval-ready workflow, analytics visibility, and easier management of comments and evergreen ideas. Those are the operational improvements that justify pricing more than any isolated feature label.
When a team moves from scattered drafting and manual reminders to a structured workflow, the result is usually not just better organization. It is better follow-through. Pricing is designed to support that shift without creating procurement complexity.
What Is Included
The plans align with the same capabilities highlighted on the homepage.
Every pricing choice is meant to sit on top of the same core product story. That includes LinkedIn scheduling, the creative workflow for drafting content, analytics visibility, approval handling, and a cleaner way to manage recurring ideas. The difference between plans is not a separate product experience. It is the level of campaign continuity you want to support. That is an important distinction because it keeps the buying decision clear. You are choosing the pace and duration of execution rather than trying to decode a maze of disconnected feature tiers.
For teams that care about procurement clarity, this also reduces implementation risk. There is less room for confusion around what the platform does, what your team is expected to manage internally, and what behavior you should expect after purchase. The home page establishes the product promise; this pricing page simply shows the commitment levels available to support that promise over time.
Next Step
Move from reading about the plans to seeing the workflow in action.
If you already know which price point fits your publishing rhythm, go directly to the platform pricing flow. If you still want context, visit the platform and feature pages first to understand how the text, image, carousel, and video workflows fit together. Either path keeps the decision grounded in the same information you saw on the homepage rather than pushing you toward an isolated pricing table with no operational context.